Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute from Jean-Jacques Moreau on 2002-06-26 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from June 2002)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:19:47 +0200
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
CC: Web Service Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3D19DB93.B5B8830@crf.canon.fr>

Well spotted! Yes, I think it should be optional too (the default value
being .../ultimateReceiver).

Jean-Jacques.

Martin Gudgin wrote:

> In your proposal below you use the phrase 'mandatory soap:role AII' but
> then in the grammer you have role='uri'?
>
> So two things;
>
> 1.      Did you intend to say 'role AII' ( unqualified )?
>
> 2.      Did you intend to say 'optional'?
>
> FWIW I think the answer to both questions should be 'yes' ;-)

Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 11:20:44 UTC