- From: Matt Long <mlong@phalanxsys.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:31:52 -0500
- To: "'WS-Desc WG \(Public\)'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
What issues(s) do multi-service WSDLs present? -Matt Long Phalanx Systems, LLC > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:47 PM > To: WS-Desc WG (Public) > Subject: Fw: issue: service type > > > I posted this a while back, but there was literally no discussion > that I can recall. Is this issue so boring?? > > Also related is the following: > <issue id="issue-multiple-services"> > <head>Should a single WSDL file only define one service?</head> > WSDL 1.1 suppports having multiple services in a single WSDL > file. This has caused confusion amongst users. > <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> > </issue> > > Anyone with opinions or can I resolve it myself? ;-) > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> > To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org> > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:29 AM > Subject: issue: service type > > > > I would like to open discussion on the following issue: > > > > <issue id="issue-service-type"> > > <head>Should we have an abstract view of a service?</head> > > WSDL defines a service as a collection of ports, but there is no > > abstract analog. > > <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source> > > </issue> > > > > > > Sanjiva. > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 16:42:36 UTC