Agenda for 18 July 2002 WS Description WG

Dial in information (members only) [0]:

[0] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jul/0031.html

See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters. 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda

1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is:
    Mike McHugh (fallback Jochen Ruetschlin, Adi Sakala, Igor Sedukhin,
Bill Stumbo, Sandra Swearingen, Jerry Thrasher)

-------------------
2.  Approval of minutes [3].
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0243.html

-------------------
3.  Review of Action items.
     2002-06-20: Jean-J. Analyze whether WSD should gneralize a
                 mechanism to provide protocol headers. This was 
                 discussed as part of 6d. Issue: SOAPAction2 #2
                 actor URI in WSDL? #17
     2002-06-20: JeffS Champion for 6h. Issue: Default for transport 
                 of <soap:binding> #18
[4]  2002-06-27: JM will think about what should be done with the
                 suggestion for a note or appendix on 1.2 -> 1.2
transition.
     2002-07-11: Glen to ping Tom on 
                 issue-remove-optional-name-of-definition
[5]  2002-07-11: Roberto to inumerate three options on Issue 25 and 
              post to email
PEND 2002-07-11: DavidB to do Solicit/Response presentation at September
F2F
     2002-07-11: Sanjiva to post email on issues 6a, 41

[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0090.html
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0071.html

-------------------
4. SOAP 1.2 support TF [6]. Conclusions:
  (1) We need to be able to express MEPs in the SOAP binding.
  (2) The ability to describe features and MEPs at the abstract level
would
      be a good thing, but right now we don't know how much effort it
would
      take to do so.
  (3) Feedback to XMLP WG: lack of something (such as a header) to
express
      the MEP in use.  (Glen: perhaps we should say that, for each
binding,
      there must be a way to identify unambiguously the MEP in use; of 
      course, for bindings that support just one MEP that's a no-op).
  (4) Currently, there is no well-defined one-way MEP.
4a: Where should minutes go?

[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jul/0028.html 

-------------------
5.  SOAP 1.2 Last Call [7, 8, 9] call for review [10].  Need volunteer
to consolidate our official comments for approval by July 18th.

[7] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/ 
[8] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/ 
[9] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/ 
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0001.html

-------------------
6.  New Issues
    - none -

-------------------
7.  Issue: optional "name" attribute of <definition>
    Sanjiva's proposal to remove this attribute [11].  Waiting for Tom
to have one more chance to raise objections.

[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0175.html

-------------------
8.  Issue: Overloading operations.
    Split issue into two [12].
    Jonathan's proposal for remaining part [13].

[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0247.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0090.html

-------------------
9.  Abstract Model [14, 15].  Introduction by Gudge [16] and initial
impressions.

[14]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.am.xml
[15]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.am.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0083.html

-------------------
10. (Issue # missing) Hoisting SOAP binding attributes [17]
Three +1s and one note of caution [18]

[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0058.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0086.html

-------------------
11. Proposal for encoding and use attributes. [19]

[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Jul/0016.html

-------------------
16. Issue 5: EncodingStyle.
    Arthur recommends closing as a dupe of Issue #30. [20]

[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0178.html

-------------------
17. Issue 25: Interaction between W3C XML Schema and SOAP Data Model 
    Gudge's explains at [21], Roberto's options at [22].

[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0186.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0071.html

-------------------
18. Issue 30: soap:body encodingStyle
    Arthur's proposal [23]

[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0178.html

-------------------
Issues for future telcons:

19. Issue service-type:  [24] Waiting on Abstract Component work to
provide a more concrete proposal.

[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0002.html

-------------------
20. Issue remove-solicit-response-operations: Removing solicit-response
and notifications.  [25] Scheduled for FTF.

[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0109.html

-------------------
21. HTTP Binding Issues (6a, 41)
    Jeffrey recommends no change [26].  Sanjiva is mulling this over
[27]

[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0102.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jul/0067.html

- Jonathan

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 18:55:48 UTC