- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:42:07 -0500
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
- Cc: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
I believe I've finished making our terminology consistent in our WSA
document[1]. Informally:
provider agent -- the agent that realizes a Web service
requester agent -- the agent that interacts with a provider agent
provider entity -- the person or org. owning the provider agent
requester entity -- the person or org. owning the requester agent
service requester -- (ambiguous; to be avoided in this doc)
service provider -- (ambiguous; to be avoided in this doc)
As a result, there were a MANY small changes I made along the way. Most
weren't worth noting, but a few I wanted to mention:
Changed some occurrences of the word "entity" when it wasn't referring to
our defined term "requester entity" or "provider entity".
Tweeked the concept description of "service" accordingly.
Deleted "A resource is an entity" from the concepts definition of
"resource", in order to avoid confusing it with our "person or
organization" use of the term "entity". Since a resource can be anything,
I think we can probably do without the statement. Frank, do you want to
push back on this change, or are you okay with this?
The term "service" (as a noun) was used in two different ways: (a) to refer
to a task ("X asked Y to perform a particular service"); or (b) to refer to
the thing that performs the task ("X sent a message to Y's service"). I've
tried to changes uses of sense (a) to use "task" instead.
Added concept definitions of "requester entity" and "provider
entity". They are a little meager. Frank may want to fill them out
better, but I ran out of time tonight.
Whew!
1.
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/arch/wsa/wd-wsa-arch-review2.html
--
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2004 20:42:10 UTC