RE: REST wrap-up (was Re: Web Services Architecture Document from Jim Webber on 2004-02-09 (www-ws-arch@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:36:40 -0000
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA801CC76A@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>

Mark:

> No, it shouldn't be, that's my point.  All of those systems I 
> mentioned define the abstractions.

And WSA defines its abstractions too. One of them happens to be a
message. Why is this less valid than an inbox?

Jim

Received on Sunday, 8 February 2004 22:38:21 UTC