Hey, Just trying to keep things brief ... On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:39:02AM -0000, Jim Webber wrote: > > A message is not an application abstraction, it's the means > > by which an abstraction is utilized. Using the canonical > > stock quote example, the stock is the abstraction (the thing > > with the interface), and the messages manipulate that > > abstraction using that interface. > > No, no, no. It is up to me what my abstractions are, No, it shouldn't be, that's my point. All of those systems I mentioned define the abstractions. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.caReceived on Sunday, 8 February 2004 22:33:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:58 UTC