- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 22:33:58 -0500
- To: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Hey, Just trying to keep things brief ... On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:39:02AM -0000, Jim Webber wrote: > > A message is not an application abstraction, it's the means > > by which an abstraction is utilized. Using the canonical > > stock quote example, the stock is the abstraction (the thing > > with the interface), and the messages manipulate that > > abstraction using that interface. > > No, no, no. It is up to me what my abstractions are, No, it shouldn't be, that's my point. All of those systems I mentioned define the abstractions. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Sunday, 8 February 2004 22:33:45 UTC