- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:01:25 -0600
- To: "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
You are correct. Obviously David and Hugo must decide this. If I were
in their position a statement like, "because we definitely would have
done so last Wednesday had we been aware of ..." would make me
uncomfortable -- but I am, mercifully, not in their position. Maybe I'm
trying to be too careful.
-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Champion
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 12:54 PM
To: 'www-ws-arch@w3.org '
Subject: Re: Crossreferencing the spec list with Apache's
On Feb 1, 2004, at 1:31 PM, Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote:
>
>
> Having said that, I think I might support putting a link to this list
> in
> the Appendix, with some text like, "Another list of Web services
> specifications may be found at ...". I say, however, "think". It
> makes
> me nervous that this seems to be getting perilously close to "adding
or
> modifying content", which I think is a serious no-no at this point.
> Are
> we endorsing this list?
Not any more than we're endorsing yours. As I recall, there is quite a
disclaimer about your list in Appendix A. I'm just suggesting that we
make that plural and point to the Apache one as well, because it *is* a
living document. Without any endorsement, of course.
>
>
> Actually, now that I have thought more about it, I regret to say that
> I think putting in such a link is on the wrong side of the line, and
> that drawing and maintaining that line is really important.
IMHO there's no line, there's no working group. And no chair, and I
have no more say in this than anyone on this list :-) I would suggest
that David and Hugo, using their de facto authority as publishers of
the document, put a link to the Apache list as a service to our readers
because we definitely would have done so last Wednesday had we been
aware of the Apache list. They can put as many disclaimers as they
want.
I guess an alternative would be for those of us who wish to have some
continuing role in organizing our collective thoughts about the
architectural implications of WS and SOA setup a FAQ list or a Wiki or
something.
1. Q: "I'm confused about all the %*&^%* "web services" specs. Is
there a complete list somewhere?"
A: The best you'll find is
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?WebServicesSpecifications
(But it changes frequently, you might want to subscribe to
http://www.dehora.net/rss/wsasf-rss10.xml). Use this and all other such
lists with extreme caution; they contain a mixture of real de facto
standards, protostandards that are being actively developed,
interesting proposals that are getting serious consideration, and pure
marketing fluff.
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2004 14:02:01 UTC