RE: Apache WS-* spec list

Swamp alert!  Whoop, whoop!! Swamp alert!

Please see my recent posting on the private list.  I think we are
getting into discussions that might end up being counterproductive.

Just my personal opinion for what it's worth.

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Ugo Corda
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:29 PM
To: David Orchard; Paul Denning; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Apache WS-* spec list



Yes, it's a wiki with a big header on top that says "Apache Software
Foundation" ...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:24 PM
> To: Ugo Corda; 'Paul Denning'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Apache WS-* spec list
> 
> 
> huh?  it's a wiki.
> 
> Dave
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> > Behalf Of Ugo Corda
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:04 PM
> > To: Paul Denning; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: Apache WS-* spec list
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Interesting. In all the areas where multiple overlapping
> > specs exist today (transactions, reliable messaging, 
> > orchestration/choreography) this list only mentions one of 
> > the specs, and it also just happens they all are from the 
> > same WS camp ... I would have expected a little more balanced 
> > approach from the Apache organization.
> > 
> > Ugo
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> > > Behalf Of Paul Denning
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:18 AM
> > > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> > > Subject: Apache WS-* spec list
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > fyi,
> > > 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?WebServicesSpecifications
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:49:48 UTC