- From: Sergio Andreozzi <sergio.andreozzi@cnaf.infn.it>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 13:03:16 +0200
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Dear WS-ARCH group members, the Web Services description is currently defined in the latest Web Service Architecture document (1.5.3) as: "The service description is a machine processable specification of the message formats, datatypes and protocols that should be used between the requester agent and the provider agent. It also specifies the network location of the provider agent, and may provide some information about the message exchange pattern that is expected" In the research community, I've seen some attempt at representing the service state by using WSDL extensions, i.e. by extending the web service description with attributes that carry the information related to the current state of a service. This means that, for each service instance, a WSDL document should be created. I would like to receive your point of view on the following issue. From the definition you give, I understand that the service state is a concept more related to the service representation (def. 2.2.29), while the service description (def. 2.2.32) should describe service interface and semantics. Extending a WSDL document with service representation related data is somewhat merging service description with service representation. This solution might be handy when you want, for instance, advertise the quality related attributes in order to make a QoS based discovery. From a Web Service Architecture point of view, how do you deal with this issue and the above solution? Any clarification is appreciated. Thanks, Sergio A. -- Sergio Andreozzi Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare - CNAF Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 40127 BOLOGNA ITALY E-mail : sergio.andreozzi@cnaf.infn.it Website: www.cnaf.infn.it/~sergio
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2003 07:03:30 UTC