- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 06:52:19 -0400
- To: Jim Webber <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
- Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:38:58AM +0100, Jim Webber wrote: > > But my point remains; it's nonsensical to have two methods > > for the same task; if you use the WebMethod feature, you > > remove the need for specifying a wsdl:operation. > > And the inverse is not true? No, the inverse is (mostly) true too. I would suggest that's why some people have called the Web Method feature unnecessary. It really *is* unnecessary if you've accepted that you need WSDL to define the operation. It's probably not worth elaborating on what I mean by "mostly" there. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis Actively seeking contract work or employment
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2003 06:49:58 UTC