> > But whether WSD or WSCHOR eventually looks into this, I *do* think that we > need to have concepts/relationships that describe how a Web service > maintains its state. This is obviously tied up with the more abstract > discussions we've had over the role of "statelessness" in the Web > architecture. > Surely, the way a Web service maintains its state must be an implementation detail. How do we refer to/address that state and whether there is value in providing a standard way for creating/modifying/accessing it should be the topic of discussion, but in the appropriate WGs. .savas.Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2003 07:57:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:51 UTC