Web Services Architecture Working Group response to your comment [ISSUE #9]

Dear Mr. Reagle,

      Thank you very much for your comment to the WSA Working Group. We
very much appreciate your time and effort in sending us this comment. Your
comment has been added to the WSA Issues List [1] and will be resolved
according to the WSA Issues process [2]. In your email [3] , there were
several
comments, which have been assigned issue IDs #7-12. Each of these comments
has been scheduled to be addressed individually.

      Concerning your comment on section D-AC001.1.1 of the requirements
document [3], you state that the text expresses a noble sentiment, but is
in practice unworkable as stated. The editors of the Requirements document
concur with your comment, and accept your proposed wording, with a slight
change, as follows:

D-AC001.1.1 Ensure that architectural decisions will not be made on the
basis of favoring any particular implementor or implementation over others.

      This change will take place prior to the next publication of the
document. Again, thank you for your comment.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/issues/wsa-issues.html

[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/04/wd-wsa-issues-process-20020426

[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-wsa-comments/2002Aug/0000.html

Regards,

D-

*************************************************
Dr. Daniel Austin
Sr. Technical Architect / Architecture Team Lead
daniel_austin@notes.grainger.com <----- Note change!
847 793 5044
Visit http://www.grainger.com

"If I get a little money, I buy books. If there is anything left over, I
buy clothing and food."
-Erasmus

Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2003 17:43:44 UTC