- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:06:00 -0500
- To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:26:38AM -0600, Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote: > This looks to me like a good definition within the context of looking at > architecture, but in the context of RM it doesn't look entirely > appropriate to me. In the same sense that some of the definitions of > synchronous floating around look perfectly fine to me, but not > appropriate for our particular context. Agreed. I just thought that these definitions may be glossary-bound, and if that's the case I think that either a more general definition of reliability is required, or alternately I suppose, that "reliable" is qualified as applying to reliable messaging only. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:16:41 UTC