- From: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:08:00 +1000
- To: "'Mark Baker'" <mbaker@iam-net.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 01:06:33 UTC
Yes, you would have content in two places. I don't see anything wrong with this since we allow external data to be part of a message anyway. Hao -----Original Message----- From: Mark Baker [mailto:mbaker@iam-net.com] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:32 PM To: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Re: FW: Proposed draft text for 2.2.21 On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:55:29PM -0600, Champion, Mike wrote: > A message can be as simple as an HTTP GET request, in which the HTTP headers > are the headers and the parameters encoded in the URL are the content. I was expecting that "content" would refer to the body, no? Otherwise, on a POST, since there's a URI and a body, you'd have the content in two places. So I'd suggest that the last part be rewritten as "and there is no content", or alternately, just snipped. Thanks. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 01:06:33 UTC