- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:33:45 -0400
- To: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:08:00PM +1000, Hao He wrote: > Yes, you would have content in two places. I don't see anything wrong with > this since we allow external data to be part of a message anyway. Ok, good point. Let me offer a different reason. I don't consider the intent of "GET http://www.example.com?foo=bar" to be to send "foo=bar" to example.com. I consider that the intent is to get a representation of the resource identified by that URI. Why I believe this is an important difference is because the obligation of interpretation of that string lies with the recipient, not with the sender. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 07:28:50 UTC