- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:42:14 -0700
- To: "'Cutler, Roger \(RogerCutler\)'" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 16:42:52 UTC
Before this thread gets out of control, please note that this section was contributed by 1 person and has not been reviewed nor approved by the TAG. There is an expectation of more text coming. We were even talking about removing this section if the TAG doesn't get the extra text. I agree with Roger's comments and will be active on the discussion. Cheers, Dave -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:59 PM To: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Verbiage from TAG The most recent architecture document from the TAG includes the following. I personally do not understand why SOAP is being called an architectural style and what a meta-architecture is. <quote> 4. Interaction This section will describe the architectural principles and constraints regarding interactions between components, including such topics as network protocols and interaction styles, along with interactions between the Web as a system and the people that make use of it. This will include the role of architectural styles, such as REST and SOAP, and the impact of meta-architectures, such as Web Services and the Semantic Web. </quote>
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 16:42:52 UTC