- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 21:30:04 +0200
- To: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- Cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Hi Martin. I will also reply to your other email, but for now: * Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com> [2003-06-12 09:57-0700] > Bottom line is that a message may end up in the hands of more than one > ultimate receiver in a multicast transport. > I think the discussion is really about whether one thinks of multicast as a > single path with multiple recipients (the * on ultimate receiver), or > multiple paths, one for each recipient ( a 1 on ultimate receiver). Both are > equally valid models, but which one do we (and the xmlp guys) prefer? My understanding of SOAP 1.2, and therefore my preference for us, is the latter. But I think that Jean-Jacques was going with the former, and he is an XMLP guy, so I am not sure which one is the right one now. I think that we should get this right though. Maybe Jean-Jacques can help us on this. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:30:06 UTC