- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 14:26:18 -0500
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF1F65A74D.55E2D8C5-ON85256CA8.00732880-85256CAA.006AA014@rchland.ibm.com>
Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote on 01/08/2003 03:54:50 PM: <snip/> > > In progress, at least for Waka. But while that's important, it doesn't > matter to the uniform constraint. It's uniform, because the meaning of > "MONITOR" and "WATCH" is meaningful to all things with identity (I can > use it to monitor dogs, chickens, lava flows, weather reports). The No it isn't. It is meaningful to resources which support that method for starters. Secondly, unless I'm mistaken, I still have no idea whether this is your MONITOR or mine... Will I get a lizard on my doorstep next week or will I be notified that the state has changed through some less toothy means? Further, can you demonstrate/prove how it is that your assertion that the uniformity of the interface with regards to all identified resources is what actually derives the benefits you suggest? *MIGHT* it be the case that it is the standardization within a domain that has accorded much of the benefits observed? > only thing that would make it non-uniform is if it was only meaningful > to a subset of things, such as MONITOR-STOCK-QUOTE only being meaningful > to stock quotes. > > MB > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca > Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com phone: +1 508 234 3624
Received on Friday, 10 January 2003 14:30:56 UTC