- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:54:50 -0500
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Hi again. I'm trying to keep things brief. On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:14:16PM -0500, Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > Other generic things you can do include; > > > > - setting the state of some resource (PUT) > > Whoa, back up the bus! Where did the agent get the understanding needed > to populate an instance of a document defined by the schema? Hmm, well, if an automaton is hardcoded to know that "1" means on, and "2" means off, then it also knows that PUTting a "1" will change the state to on, and PUTting a "2" will change the state to off. Is that what you meant? > > (Waka/Idokorro/KnowNow MONITOR/WATCH) > > Hmmm... and where is the IETF RFC that defines these methods? In progress, at least for Waka. But while that's important, it doesn't matter to the uniform constraint. It's uniform, because the meaning of "MONITOR" and "WATCH" is meaningful to all things with identity (I can use it to monitor dogs, chickens, lava flows, weather reports). The only thing that would make it non-uniform is if it was only meaningful to a subset of things, such as MONITOR-STOCK-QUOTE only being meaningful to stock quotes. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2003 15:54:19 UTC