- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:40:57 -0400
- To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
By using UDDI that way, you've completely marginalized it! Good job! 8-) Seriously, everything UDDI would do for you in that case could be done better with URIs and GET. I think the de-facto standard WSDL-over-GET demonstrates that. MB On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:46:16AM -0700, Ugo Corda wrote: > Mark, > > If A and B are two partners in a B2B interaction, B could maintain a private > UDDI registry and A could be given access to it. So A's best way to access B > services' interfaces could be through B's UDDI. > > I am not saying that it's the only way for A to communicate with B. I am > just pointing out that the concept of UDDI as a third party dropped into an > otherwise pure P2P scenario is not that clearly cut in all cases. > > Ugo -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 13:40:33 UTC