- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:45:08 -0700
- To: Anne Thomas Manes <anne@manes.net>
- CC: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > Systinet WASP has supported service references for more than a year. It > references a Web service by its WSDL port. To pass a service by reference, > you return the URI of the WSDL port, and you return an instance ID of the > service instance in a SOAP header. You can reconnect to the same instance by > dynamically connecting to the service (using a dynamic proxy or a DDI) and > specifying the instance ID in the SOAP header. The WSDL file for the service > indicates what types and headers are used in the service. I am curious why I must pass a URI and an instanceID to connect to a service instance rather than naming each service instance by a single resolvable URI as is done elsewhere on the Web? Also, I'd like to hear more about the WSDL. Obviously it is trivial to make a WSDL where a complexType "PO" is repeated or made optional through a parent's content model: <element name="purchase_orders"> <complexType> <element name="po" minoccurs="0" maxoccurs="20"> <sequence>...</sequence> </element> </complexType> </element> Can I similarly refer to *references* to purchase order *services* (or port types)? >... > It would be nice to define a standard SOAP extension to accomplish services > by reference, but I don't view it as a top priority. We had a discussion > about service references on Apache axis-dev a while back, but it didn't go > anywhere. I objserve that an awareness of this issue is not widespread in the Web Services industry. Individual web service deployers invent one-off solutions (UDDIs, XPaths, handles) and because they do not yet care about interoperability BETWEEN web services, they see no problem with using home-grown solutions. Paul Prescod
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 18:45:41 UTC