RE: arch diagrams from the f2f

Yeah, something like that.

-----Original Message-----
From: [] 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:31 PM
Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f

Here's a simple suggestion.  Have overlapping circles at the Service
Requestor and add an additional arrow from the Service Provider to another
one of these circles.  That would suggest other participants can interact.
Just to throw another fly in that ointment, however, multicast MEPs would
have multiple Service Providers as well.  So maybe we should be symmetric in
the added circles and arrows.


Mark A. Jones
AT&T Labs
Shannon Laboratory
Room 2A-02
180 Park Ave.
Florham Park, NJ  07932-0971

phone: (973) 360-8326
  fax: (973) 236-6453

	From Mon Sep 23 14:17 EDT 2002
	X-UIDL: +1P!!=`/!!>bo"!o~H!!
	X-Authentication-Warning: postfixfilter
set sender to using -f
	Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:15:45 -0400 (EDT)
	Resent-Message-Id: <>
	From: "Champion, Mike" <>
	Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:15:20 -0400
	MIME-Version: 1.0
	Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f
	X-Mailing-List: <> archive/latest/2603
	List-Id: <>
	List-Help: <>
	X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20

	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) 
	> []
	> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:45 PM
	> To: 'Mark Jones'; Heather Kreger
	> Cc:
	> Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f
	> I am still concerned that these diagrams seem visually to restrict
	> services to one messaging pattern.  No matter what the words 
	> might say in
	> the text, I think that having pictures that leave this 
	> impression would not
	> be good.

	Cn you propose revised pictures that would not leave this erroneous

Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 16:50:10 UTC