- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:48:42 -0800
- To: "'Ugo Corda'" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <003901c291c0$e7fb0010$570ba8c0@beasys.com>
Ugo, I'm quite interested in the reasons. I don't really want to raise it as a wsa issue without doing some homework on this. Perhaps could you ask one or two of the appropriate UDDI folks for the ratoinale? Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Ugo Corda > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:42 PM > To: Mark Baker; www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: UDDI's UUIDs issue > > > > I raised exactly this issue at the UDDI F2F last week, and I > was given a list of reasons why the existing http scheme > would not adequate (reasons that sounded good to me at the > time, but whose details I have unfortunately forgotten). > > If the WSA WG wants to officially investigate this issue, I > can ask the UDDI people who worked on version 3 under > UDDI.org to prepare a list of rationales for the WSA WG that > explain why a new URI scheme was necessary. > > Ugo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:13 PM > To: Ugo Corda > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: UDDI's UUIDs issue > > > In this context, the "good practice" suggestion of the TAG to avoid > using new URI schemes when existing ones would suffice (in this case, > the "http" scheme would suffice), is also important, I believe; > > http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-scheme > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:56:35PM -0800, Ugo Corda wrote: > > While going through the latest architecture doc draft, I > noticed that 5.1, Identifiers, has an issue about the UUID > identifiers used by UDDI. I think I can add some information > that can at least partially clarify the issue. > > > > Starting with version 3, the UDDI spec requires that all > keys be expressed as URIs (see [1]). It also recommends that > the URI scheme "uddi" be used. The UDDI TC plans to formally > register this new URI scheme in the near future. It is still > possible to use UUID-based identifiers, but they have to be > wrapped in a in a "uddi:" URI format. > > > > Ugo > > > > [1] > http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.00-published-20020719.htm#_Toc12653651 > > MB > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca > > Will distribute objects for food > >
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 19:49:28 UTC