- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:41:49 -0500
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:19:03AM -0700, Champion, Mike wrote: > I guess I'd respectfully suggest that you wait until the Webarch document > is relatively final, WSDL 1.2 is relatively final, and then raise > issues about their incompatibility. Or better yet, propose specific > additions > to WSDL 1.2 that makes it more consistent with your conception of the web > architecture, and propose specific additions to the TAG document to make > it express the principles -- both WSD and the TAG do much of their work in > public. IMO, there's been far too much waiting, considering what's at stake. I've had enough of it, frankly. Let's all work together to at least confront this issue head-on, because I'm sure we're all tired of it. If I lose, so be it. If I win, hopefully my prospects of finding a new job will improve. 8-) Besides, what I have to say to the WSDL WG, they don't want to hear. And I already said it when I voted against chartering the Web Services Activity; HTTP defines a sufficient application interface. > WSA already has a requirement to keep the WS architecture aligned with the > web architecture. I feel that we've bent over backwards to keep from simply > rubber-stamping non-RESTful current practice. Yes, thanks for that. > But your respectful request will be considered when the WG addresses > the issue you've raised :-) .. and that too. MB
Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 12:38:56 UTC