- From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 08:53:36 -0800
- To: "'Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)'" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
>As it stands, it seems to me that this business value may be achieved by a >rather small subset of the complex specs in play. That is, what I would >call (probably not very accurately) the message sequencing part. One advantage of establishing a standard for executable business processes (as opposed to just interface-based abstract ones) is that it would make it possible to create a new business of manufacturing and distributing prepackaged business processes. In this scenario, companies with expertise in defining business processes for particular vertical industries can create standard-based prepackaged business processes that other companies can acquire and deploy within their systems (hopefully with minimum or no modifications at all). This would allow companies to incorporate industry best practices while reducing cost, complexity, and time to deployment (no need to reinvent the wheel every time a new process needs to be created). Depending on the success of this approach, open source code could also become available based on this standardized language and infrastructure for executable business processes creation. Ugo
Received on Friday, 1 November 2002 11:54:14 UTC