- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:49:01 -0400
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:47:20AM -0400, Champion, Mike wrote: > We're talking about WSA here, not WSD. Hmm. I'm talking about other Web services working groups; peers of WSD who actually produce implementable specs (i.e. not us 8-). > IMHO, one can make a good case for a > WSDL-like language based on RDF without insisting that *all* components of > the web services architecture be mapped to RDF. Right. Hence "should". > For example, it's not > obvious to me how an RDF mapping would address the reliability issue in a > useful way. See; http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/drafts/formalism.html http://www.w3.org/XML/9711theory/HTTP.html > So, WSD chartered itself to produce an RDF mapping, that's their > decision and we'll all learn from the success or failure of that effort. I > see no reason at this point to insist that other WGs spawned by the WSA need > this constraint. They didn't charter themselves that way, that's impossible. The membership and team did. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 09:40:29 UTC