- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:32:31 -0400
- To: wsawg public <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
D-AR009.2 "All recommendations produced by the working group include a normative mapping between all XML technologies and RDF/XML." CVX: I do not think that semantic web requirements should be driving the web services architecture group, but more the reverse. I don't have any particular objection to supplying mappings to RDF/XML, but I don't like making it a requirement with the word "all" showing up repeatedly. Maybe this is because I don't really know what is involved. If it is really easy, let's just do it in order to be cooperative with a promising research effort (semantic web). If it is time-consuming or restrictive in some way, however, I don't like this being a requirement. If this goal is articulated at all I'd like to see some sort of escape clause, like "An effort will be made to provide mappings ..." or something. SUNW: We agree with Hugo's suggested update to the wording: "New technologies identified in the architecture must include a normative mapping between all XML technologies and RDF/XML." This was originally proposed in the thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0075.html IBM: I think this is an undue burden on this working group and requires a semantic web expert team in the group to volunteer to do this work. We have a significant amount of work and agreement to achieve, a reoccuring concern (which we share) about time to market for this architecture. I think adding this requirement may cause significant burden and may jeapardize ability to deliver in a short period of time. At the very least, this should be done JOINTLY with resources from the semantic web activity W3C: See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0075.html Rereading this, maybe "recommendations" in this requirements is talking about recommending now technologies and is actually OK. This wording did generate some confusion about what it meant though. Anymay, I agree with the requirement but the wording may need some tweaking. DCX: Are we really supposed to provide a mapping between *ALL XML technologies* in general and RDF/XML? PF: I prefer Hugo's rephrasing <proposal from="Hugo"> "New technologies identified in the architecture must include a normative mapping between all XML technologies and RDF/XML." </proposal> Or, a slight twist that attempts to clarify scope: <proposal from="chair"> "New Web Services WGs chartered to develop new technologies identified in the architecture must be required to provide a normative mapping to RDF/XML." </proposal>
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2002 13:35:28 UTC