D-AC006.3 discussion points from Christopher Ferris on 2002-05-04 (www-ws-arch@w3.org from May 2002)

From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 09:54:05 -0400
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <3CD3E7FD.2030001@sun.com>

MSFT: The same complaint obtains as with 6.2: the model is meant to bring
forth those considerations with respect to which policies are stated.

SUNW: WSAWG's responsibility is not to develop these, but to outline and
scope them for a new WG to take on as a deliverable.

The parenthetical comment "(to be executed by security mechanisms)" should
be removed.

TIB: This may be in the scope of a chartered Security WG

CrossWeave: Again, security model should contain the mechanisms which are
coordinated by policies of implementations.

Received on Saturday, 4 May 2002 09:56:18 UTC