- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:53:45 -0500 (EST)
- To: chris.ferris@sun.com (Christopher Ferris)
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Mark, > > I used the term "XML Infoset" which is not the same as > XML1.0 anglebrackets and so does not constrain the "what" > which amounts to some mechanism by which an XML Infoset > is "expressed" (serialized). Hmm, well, what kind of formats are expressible in the Infoset? Can GIF be expressed, for example? I don't know, but was assuming it couldn't. If it can, then I think your proposed definition is a fine one. My response to Dave where I brought up the Infoset was meant to suggest that being less restrictive was good, but still not as good as not restricting I/O formats at all. MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 15:49:46 UTC