RE: D-AC005 CSFs

• From: Dave Hollander <dmh@contivo.com>
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 07:35:50 -0700
• To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
• Message-ID: <BD52C6379806D51188DD00508BEEC96C4B64AC@mail.contivo.com>

Agree - D-AC005 CSFs - they should be dropped.

The principles they cover are good, but better described
either elsewhere or in our actions.

I also agree that we must concentrate on the glossary. It is
a very import document. No matter how colloquial we try to
keep our language usage, we will end up with words that carry
additional nuance. Common vocabulary will make it much easier
to keep several parallel groups in sync (a very real role of 
architecture).

Dave

Received on Friday, 26 July 2002 10:38:49 UTC