RE: AG004 Closure Sought

Hugo,

I've been under the impression that the AC020.x were
Privacy requirements mistakenly prefixed with AC instead of AR,
and AC020 was the critical success factor (CSF).
They surely read like requirements instead of CSFs to me.
If those are indeed AC's, then I think some ARs are needed
to be stated, because it's hard to imagine there'll be only
CSFs but no requirements under the Privacy section in the
requirements spec.

Cheers,

Joe Hui
Exodus, a Cable & Wireless service
=========================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:53 PM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: AG004 Closure Sought
> 
> 
> 
> * Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> [2002-07-24 13:40+0200]
> > As for the P3P-Policy traveling with the request, we have 
> the same issue
> > with SOAP and it will be probably solved the same way.. I 
> find the usage
> > scenario described by Hugo is accurate.
> 
> I have added an editorial note in the editors' copy of the usage
> scenarios document to add privacy usage scenarios and integrate them
> with the travel agent service use case[1]:
> 
>    Editorial note: HH                                       2002-07-24
>    Some privacy usage scenarios should be added to illustrate 
> the AC020
>    critical success factor, e.g. based on the mailing list 
> discussions.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hugo
> 
>   1. 
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/arch/scenarios/ws-
> arch-scenarios.html?rev=1.13&content-type=text/html#Cases
> -- 
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - 
> tel:+1-617-452-2092
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 17:17:28 UTC