- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:53:30 -0400
- To: "WSA W3C Public (E-mail)" <www-ws-arch@w3c.org>
I agree with pretty much everything.
A comment though:
* ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1) <zulah_eckert@hp.com> [2002-07-15 18:11-0400]
> AC012 [4]:
>
> 4. D-AR012.4 - usage scenarios and use cases must be referencable via
> URI(reference)
> Proposal: reword to "usage scenarios and use cases must be given a URI"
> Status: We had two dissenting votes on 12.4. The issues were that it was
> "purely editorial" and exactly what this implied ("giving URI name" vs.
> "publishing at URI").
Since I was one of the ones who thought it was purely editorial, I
will reiterate my command in light of Mike Champion's "eliminate
'motherhood' statements that have little real meaning to us" _and_
"when in doubt, throw it out" rules:
- this is purely editorial, and just makes sense: as a matter of fact,
it already is the case, and it can be argued that this is covered by
the W3C publication rules.
- I don't see the value for the Web services architecture, which is
what we are talking about here.
Having said that, I think that we should not spend more than 30
seconds on this so I will live with any decision made (dropping it,
current wording, MarkB's wording, ...).
Regards,
Hugo
6. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0185.html
--
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 10:53:30 UTC