- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:14:53 -0400
- To: "Damodaran, Suresh" <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>
- Cc: "Wsa-public (E-mail)" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Hi Suresh, On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 01:43:47PM -0500, Damodaran, Suresh wrote: > Mark, > > > >From glossary [2] I find: > > Architecture > The software architecture of a program or computing system is the structure > or structures of the system, which comprise software components, the > externally visible properties of those components, and the relationships > among them." > > => > Architecture component = (software) component of the (software) > architecture. Ok. But why would "software component" not suffice? "component" itself is quite overloaded, and really should be qualified. I'm just suggesting that we use the qualification that is already in our architecture definition, rather than define a new term. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 15:04:04 UTC