- From: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:39:42 +1000
- To: "WSA W3C Public (E-mail)" <www-ws-arch@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <686B9E7C8AA57A45AE8DDCC5A81596AB019ED7AE@sydthqems01.INT.TISA.COM.AU>
hi, The RTF wants people's view on the following issue: Do we need a Conceptual Management Model in the requirement document? I proposed the following two items[1] to be added to D-AC18 [2] proposed by Zula and Heather. AR018.1.5 Define a standard (conceptual) management model for architectural components, their dependencies and their lifecycles. AR018.1.5 Define a standard (conceptual) management model for Web Services instances, their dependencies and their lifecycles. My motivation for suggesting them is that a high-level conceptual management model can 1) help ensure a WS architecture and service manageable; 2) be a standard starting point for future work on WS management; 3) unify metrics, management operations, and events as outlined in AR018.1 and AR018.2[2]; 4) help the deployment of a WS. Any thoughts and comments on this issue would be appreciated. Hao [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0138.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0116.html
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt
Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 01:38:44 UTC