- From: Darran Rolls <Darran.Rolls@waveset.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:38:40 -0500
- To: "Hao He" <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>, "WSA W3C Public (E-mail)" <www-ws-arch@w3c.org>
Hao Could you please (briefly) explain the nature of the suggested conceptual models, perhaps in light of something like DMTF CIM/WEBM? Thanks -------------------------------------------------------- Darran Rolls http://www.waveset.com Waveset Technologies Inc drolls@waveset.com (512) 657 8360 -------------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Hao He [mailto:Hao.He@thomson.com.au] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:40 AM > To: WSA W3C Public (E-mail) > Subject: [RTF] Conceptual Management Model (call for public discussions) > > hi, > > The RTF wants people's view on the following issue: > > Do we need a Conceptual Management Model in the requirement document? > > I proposed the following two items[1] to be added to D-AC18 [2] proposed > by > Zula and Heather. > > AR018.1.5 Define a standard (conceptual) management model for > architectural > components, their dependencies and their lifecycles. > > AR018.1.5 Define a standard (conceptual) management model for Web Services > instances, > their dependencies and their lifecycles. > > My motivation for suggesting them is that a high-level conceptual > management > model can > 1) help ensure a WS architecture and service manageable; > 2) be a standard starting point for future work on WS management; > 3) unify metrics, management operations, and events as outlined in AR018.1 > and AR018.2[2]; > 4) help the deployment of a WS. > > Any thoughts and comments on this issue would be appreciated. > > Hao > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0138.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0116.html
Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 16:39:18 UTC