RE: Reference requirements

What is it exactly that we have included so far is part of architecture and not part of a description?

We should certainly be concerned with description of anything needed in a WS *technical* contract. We may postpone certain elements until clarified by the Architecture WG.

-- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788



-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@zolera.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Sadiq, Waqar
Cc: Jacek Kopecky; Paul Prescod; www-ws-desc@w3.org; 'www-ws-arch@w3.org'
Subject: Re: Reference requirements


+1!!

> I am very concerned that we seem to be looking for a solution to a 
> problem that is fundamentally an architecture problem and not a 
> description problem.
-- 
Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,
Encryption)
http://www.zolera.com

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 14:24:22 UTC