Re: WSAWG requirements document - initial editors draft

nope, suggest you bypass your caching proxy. (<shift>Reload in
Netscape and possibly the same in explorer).

Cheers,

Chris

Sadiq, Waqar wrote:

> Is anybody else having problem downloading the requirements document.  It
> starts loading and them stops while still in the "Status" section.
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Waqar Sadiq
>  
> EDS EIT EASI - Enterprise Consultant
> MS: H3-4C-22
> 5400 Legacy Drive
> Plano, Texas 75024
>  
> phone: +01-972-797-8408 (8-837)
> e-mail: waqar.sadiq@eds.com
> fax: +01-972-605-4071
> _______________________________________________
>  
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Austin, Daniel [mailto:Austin.D@ic.grainger.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:40 PM
> To: 'www-ws-arch@w3.org'
> Subject: WSAWG requirements document - initial editors draft
> 
> Greetings,
> 
>      I've uploaded a very rough first draft of a requirements document for
> the group to discuss:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/wd-wsawg-reqs-02202002.html
> 
> This document is an editors draft and has no official status. It contains
> primarily the initial list of goals from the mailing list, with some
> additions and changes as per last week's teleconference and further
> discussions online. 
> 
> Please read this document and make comments. There is of course a great deal
> yet to be done but I believe that this document provides us with a basis on
> which we may continue our discussions. Please send all comments to the list.
> Thanks!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> D-
> 
> P.S. I am aware of some basic typographical errors and mistakes in the draft
> and will correct them as soon as possible.
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 13:12:07 UTC