RE: Required reading for the TAG

Wow! Homework already.  I am not sure if I am going to like this new
class!!!  My daughter (looking over my shoulder) got a kick out of the
assignment though.
joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@sun.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Mark Baker
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: Required reading for the TAG


Mark,

A reasonable request:) Hugo, would you please add these
under a "Related Resources" section on our public
page in a manner consistent with[1]?

Thanks,

Chris

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/#related

Mark Baker wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> When the TAG got started a few weeks ago, it was given some required
> reading assignments[1] on Web architecture[2][3][4].
> 
> IMO, since our charter states that one of our goals is to fit in with
> Web architecture, it would be a good idea for us to all understand
> what that means.  I've been studying Web architecture for the past four
> years or so, and have only recently come to have a fairly complete
> picture of it (at least I think I have 8-).  It's far from obvious,
> especially to those of you who've spent a lot of time working with RPC
> or messaging systems.
> 
> I'd also ask that Chris consider putting these links on our group home
> page.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jan/0056.html
>  [2] http://www1.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/web_arch_domain
>  [3] http://www1.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style
>  [4] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture
> 
> MB
>

Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 23:47:43 UTC