- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:04:10 -0400
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Oops, I meant to add this to that last message ... In [1], I suggested this; Basically, what I think it would be useful to do is for us to answer the following question; if all you have is a URI, and no other information, what is the richest possible application interface that can be specified a priori? Taking a step back from this, what I want to do is to take a look at things that are common about *all* Web services, so that some a priori behaviour, no matter how basic, can be defined. Our working definition of a Web service states that they all have a URI. I would also guess that it's safe to assume that all Web services have state. Plus, some eventually get retired, or move someplace else, etc.. But in general, no matter what commonality we determine exists between all Web services, the CSF could be something like this; define a "generic language for Web services" that can be used to interact with any Web service knowing only its URI Does this make sense to people, or should I go into more detail? [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Apr/0030.html MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2002 23:57:29 UTC