- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:00:10 +0000
- To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Ian Horrocks wrote: >>The Test document tries to follow S&AS by giving preference to the OWL DL >>terms, except when specifically talking about Full. >> > > Point taken. The case of rdf:XMLLiteral highlights this problem, but > there obviously isn't much we can do about it at this stage. Looking I see that in the definition of OWL Full Consistent in section 4.1.2 I have linked datatype map into the direct semantics which does not follow the convention I described above - perhaps I ought to link that to RDF Semantics too (without any explicit mention). (I suspect I am out of time) > One alternative would be to link to Section 5.2 of S&AS (i.e., > rdfs.html#5.2) in this case, although I realise that this doesn't > provide a full definition of a datatype map. I am happy to leave it to > your judgement. The text I circulated earlier is OK - but I will fix the three other mentions of datatype theory that Herman found. If I am encouraged to I'll change the hyperlink from datatype map in the
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 09:01:24 UTC