Re: please review staging drafts


One funny in owl-semantics-semantics-all.html - the table
"Characteristics of OWL classes, datatypes, and properties" in Section
5 is showing some non-existent differences. This doesn't show up in
the compound document version, and I assume it is just a minor glitch in
the comparison (maybe white space or something).

Otherwise everything looks OK.

Of course we are still engaged in a debate about some minor changes
requested by Herman and Jeremy, but I hope that this will be resolved
in this evening's teleconf.


On January 29, Sandro Hawke writes:
> I think the staging drafts [1] are just what the RECs will be
> (director willing), except for:
>      - search/replace of staging URIs
>      - removing the Pre-Publication Warning
>      - any of the changes being talked about (probably today)
> There are HTML diffs between the PR documents and these documents at:
> Among the changes I made:
>   - insertion of Status of this Document
>   - change encodings from iso-8859-1 to utf-8 (new w3c default)
>   - copyright to 2004
>   - add links to translation database and errata page
>   - set publication date of 10-Feb
> The RDF Core documents are not so far along yet.
> PLEASE let me know asap if you find any problems with these documents!
> Thanks.   :-)    By the way, by Mozilla's count, these docs total 224
> pages not including the test case data, or 942 pages with test data.
>      -- sandro
> [1]

Received on Thursday, 29 January 2004 10:21:03 UTC