Re: [Fwd: rdf:RDF element is optional]

Jim Hendler wrote:

> 
> At 16:48 +0100 1/19/04, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
>> "should" is not "must"
>>
>>
>> what about simply s/any/most/ ?
>>
>>
>> [[[[
>> Here's my try:
>>
>> [The Original Sentence]
>> "As with any RDF document, the OWL code should be
>> subelements of an rdf:RDF element."
>>
>> [A Revised Sentence]
>> "As with most RDF documents, the OWL code should be
>> subelements of an rdf:RDF element. But in the case of OWL
>> codes with only one top-level element, rdf:RDF element
>> can be omitted."
>> ]]]
> 
> 
> that works for me...

OK. Will change this in the way suggested by Jeremy.
Guus

-- 
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/

Received on Friday, 23 January 2004 09:53:34 UTC