- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:34:04 +0100
- To: "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, "WebOnt WG" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Guus You need a French guy here maybe :) > [[ > <owl:Class rdf:ID="TableWine"> > <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> > <owl:Class rdf:about="#Wine" /> > <owl:Restriction> > <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#hasSugar" /> > <owl:hasValue rdf:resource="#Dry" /> > </owl:Restriction> > </owl:intersectionOf> > </owl:Class> > ]] > > Surely, this axiom (dry wine <=> table wine) cannot be correct. > I'm not aware of any complete definition of the term "table wine", by > the way. It is usually a rather vague concept (e.g any > nonclassified wine). Agreed. "TableWine" is for me, at least if it matches the French "vin de table" a cheap, generally red, wine you put on the table at every meal when you are addicted, meaning you prefer bad wine than none at all. Wine amateurs *never* drink that stuff, unless for social reasons (being invited and not wanting to be rude). And yes, this axiom is a very approximate equivalence, in the sense that you generally won't serve sweet wines with meals. In any case I would have put "subClassOf" here instead of intersectionOf. > Also, > > [[ > <owl:Class rdf:ID="Tours"> > <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> > <owl:Class rdf:about="#Loire" /> > <owl:Restriction> > <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#locatedIn" /> > <owl:hasValue rdf:resource="#ToursRegion" /> > </owl:Restriction> > </owl:intersectionOf> > </owl:Class> > ]] > > I'm quite sure there is no such wine name in France. As far as I know, > it's called a "Touraine" (an expert should probably confirm this). Confirmed - although I'm not exactly an expert, but I happen to know that wine. Touraine is a charming "petit vin de Loire", slightly fruity red wine, to be drunk young (like Beaujolais) and a bit cool (below room temperature, but not chilled). Cheers Bernard
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 12:44:36 UTC