- From: Charles White <Charles.White@networkinference.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:39:59 -0000
- To: "Bernard Vatant" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, "WebOnt WG" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
As opposed to Napa Valley Red Table Wine which generally starts in the $50-$100 range. Napa Table Wines are blends, typically similar to a Bordeaux. They are sometimes called Meritage. However, the title Meritage has been trademarked and costs something like $1.00 per bottle to the Meritage Association for which you get some marketing or whatever. So for those wineries that don't want to pay the money, but want to make a Bordeaux style blend, you get names like Claret, Trinity, and Red Table Wine, which like I said, can be over $100 a bottle and extremely goood. chas > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernard Vatant [mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:34 AM > To: Guus Schreiber; WebOnt WG > Subject: RE: wine examples > > > > > Guus > > You need a French guy here maybe :) > > > [[ > > <owl:Class rdf:ID="TableWine"> > > <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> > > <owl:Class rdf:about="#Wine" /> > > <owl:Restriction> > > <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#hasSugar" /> > > <owl:hasValue rdf:resource="#Dry" /> > > </owl:Restriction> > > </owl:intersectionOf> > > </owl:Class> > > ]] > > > > Surely, this axiom (dry wine <=> table wine) cannot be correct. > > I'm not aware of any complete definition of the term "table > wine", by > > the way. It is usually a rather vague concept (e.g any > > nonclassified wine). > > Agreed. "TableWine" is for me, at least if it matches the > French "vin de > table" a cheap, generally red, wine you put on the table at > every meal when > you are addicted, meaning you prefer bad wine than none at all. Wine > amateurs *never* drink that stuff, unless for social reasons > (being invited > and not wanting to be rude). And yes, this axiom is a very approximate > equivalence, in the sense that you generally won't serve > sweet wines with > meals. In any case I would have put "subClassOf" here instead of > intersectionOf. > > > Also, > > > > [[ > > <owl:Class rdf:ID="Tours"> > > <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> > > <owl:Class rdf:about="#Loire" /> > > <owl:Restriction> > > <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#locatedIn" /> > > <owl:hasValue rdf:resource="#ToursRegion" /> > > </owl:Restriction> > > </owl:intersectionOf> > > </owl:Class> > > ]] > > > > I'm quite sure there is no such wine name in France. As far > as I know, > > it's called a "Touraine" (an expert should probably confirm this). > > Confirmed - although I'm not exactly an expert, but I happen > to know that > wine. Touraine is a charming "petit vin de Loire", slightly fruity red > wine, to be drunk young (like Beaujolais) and a bit cool (below room > temperature, but not chilled). > > Cheers > > Bernard > > > >
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 13:40:00 UTC