- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:56:12 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
NOTE: next telecon 9th October - next week. Chair: Guus Scribe: Jeremy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0330.html IRC: http://www.w3.org/2003/10/02-webont-irc ** 1.0 Roll Call and Admin Roll Call Present: Guus, Mike Smith, JimH, Mike_Dean, DanC, ChrisW, Ian_Horrocks, Jeff_Heflin, Jeremy, Evan_Wallace, HermantH, SeanB, Deb_Mcguinness, Yasser, CharlesW, JeromeE, JosD Regrets: Peter F. Patel-Schneider Leo Obrst Sandro Hawke Nick Gibbins Minutes of Sept 18 telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0216.html (amended as per .../0217.html - Mike Smith in attendance) approved. Next Call Oct 9, 2003 Chair: Hendler Scribe: Horrocks ** 2.0 RDF Core issues old ACTION Guus: ask Ian to do a 2nd review of RDF semantics review completed thanks to Jeff Pan Some concerns about datatypes, no showstoppers. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Oct/0032.html old ACTION HermanT: review RDF semantics w.r.t. OWL partially done, action continued "I expect more details in maths will change" Allocating reviewers of other documents (esp RDF Schema) Jim and Guus volunteered. Other members of WG encouraged to review RDF 2nd Last Call documents when they are published. Internationalization: ACTION Guus: revise proposal for WebOnt WG position on RDF Core literal decision Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Oct/0021.html We agreed that "The arguments against the alternatives proposed by I18N are compelling (see e.g. [2]). " could be rephrased for clarity. RESOLVED to send the draft, with the amendment, New actions: ACTION DanC turn Ian's reviews into test cases ACTION guus send mail to brian sumamrizing unfinished semantics review ACTION Guus review LC2 RDF schema when it comes ACTION Jim review LC2 RDF Concepts ACTION Guus revise I18N comment and send ** 3.0 - CR and Test Issues 3.1 - Test approval Proposal to approve extracredit tests http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Oct/0005.html Inconclusive discussion of test I5.26-003 and Pellet's passing of it. However, no one argued that the test should not be EXTRACREDIT. Jeremy noted that the e-mail had three parts, and it was agreed to take it as a composite. (i.e. agreeing EXTRACREDIT as an approval level, and then approving tests to that level). RESOLVED: to approve extracredit tests as in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Oct/0005.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Oct/0003.html Note some tests are excluded in the proposal, after discussion Thing-001 was also excluded. RESOLVED to approve tests per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Oct/0003.html ammended to take out Thing-001 ACTION jjc update test spec with approvals. ETA friday next week or after ACTION IanH follow up on Thing-001 and S&AS 3.2 - consistency of examples from the OWL guide Long discussion. Discussion of whether use of oneOf in the guide is merited. Discussion of whether to reclassify tests as EXTRACREDIT. Discussion of a new section in Guide to show an alternative model that's perhaps less natural but more efficient. ACTION JJC: propose to make the existing guide tests extra credit, ACTION jjc derive similar tests by mechanical transformation ACTION Jos: make addtional query-style tests. 3.3 taken after 4.0 ** 4.0 New Document - OWL implementation Hints? Arguments made in favour of publishing as WG note. Worry about workload for team contact. ACTION jimH ask mindswap for review of Sean's doc ACTION guus ask peter for review ACTION jjc: review sean's document === 3.3 changes of Test and/or S&AS, Subagenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Oct/0001.html See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Oct/0006.html A) URIs starting in "/" and "." The tests are approved, and the confusion has subsided, no question is put. B) deferred (time pressure and Peter is absent) C) Semantic Layering Bug RESOLVED to update previous decision on optionality of Ontology triple, etc. as per C/ Semantic layering bug in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Oct/0006.html (Proposed pfps - in e-mail, seconded jjc). ACTION jjc Update tests Ontology-002, Ontology-003 ACTION pfps Update S&AS re optional Ontology triple ACTION jjc Update test change log re optional Ontology triple D) cardinality-007 RESOLVED - to OBSOLETE cardinality-007 E) loops - already resolved in e-mail no discussion 3.4 - CR exit actions actions being discussed: Completed actions: ACTION JJC: add clarifying tests to OWL test repository re datatype mapping rules ACTION JJC edit tests for InverseFuncProp ACTION Guus: check ref to see if there's impact from Ontology typing ACTION JJC: see if there's an answer for this in owl-tests (something to do with "missing AllDisjoint) ACTION JJC: propose clarifying test (cf owl for owl msg) Continued actions: ACTION: Sandro - Report reasoning status re useful subsets of OWL Full. ACTION DanC: arrange for redirect (of old versions of Guide) ACTION Guus: see if Reference answers Brickley's owl:Class/rdfs:Class comment New action: ACTION jimh added disjoint on agenda ** 5.0 Outreach The following actions will be addressed in Florida at ISWC. ACTION Guus: see whether ontoweb can provide some support for OWL outreach ACTION MikeD: see whether DAML can provide some support for OWL outreach ACTION Guus: organize FAQ/guideline maintenance discussion at ISWC A BoF is likely on FAQ: potential participants include: connolly dean mcguiness horrocks hendler terhorst ACTION Guus: solicit advice on reviewing OMG proposals from SemWeb CG there s no formal mechanism, and we will treat this like reviewing RDF documents etc. Discussion involving amongst others Guus, Deb, Evan, Chris, Dan. Issues include naturalness versus comprehensiveness of OWL/UML mapping. Also semantics preservation. Preference for making input to process more than commenting on the individual proposals. New actions: ACTION debMcG send review e-mail address to list for OMG reviews ACTION guus draft parts of requirements msg on OMG proposals Discusion of DAML PI meeting. ACTION chairs representation of WebOnt at DAML PI meeting meeting adjourned - after hours discussion of DAML PI.
Received on Friday, 3 October 2003 08:58:33 UTC