Re: S&AS review: Section 5

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: S&AS review: Section 5
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:51:03 -0500

> >
> >
> >	(The specifics of datatype theories used here differ from those in
> >	the RDF semantics because there are continuing problems with RDF
> >	datatyping.  It is hoped that these problems will be resolved
> >	during last call, at which time this document will be revised to
> >	correspond directly to RDF datatyping.)
> 
> 
> Peter -
>   I would oppose moving to LC with the line above in our document --
> for a lot of reasons:
>   i. it implies we will release a new document during the LC period 
> (bad practive and possibly outlawed by process)
>   ii. it states as a WG consensus that there is a problem w/RDF 
> datatyping, which was NOT in our consensus review to RDF Core and 
> therefore could prompt them to issue a process objection to our LC
>   iii. It does not say what happens if our "hopes" are not fulfilled
> 
> I suggest the following somewhat more process-neutral wording:
> 
> 
> (The specifics of datatype theories used here differ slightly from 
> those in the RDF semantics currently under review.  It is expected 
> that these discrepancies will be resolved during last call, following 
> which this document will be revised to correspond directly to RDF 
> datatyping.)

Fine, done.

(I don't understand the difference but the new wording seems OK.)

> -- 
> Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
> Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
> Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
> Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler

The new version will show up shortly.

peter

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 15:08:16 UTC