- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:51:03 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, herman.ter.horst@philips.com
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> > > (The specifics of datatype theories used here differ from those in > the RDF semantics because there are continuing problems with RDF > datatyping. It is hoped that these problems will be resolved > during last call, at which time this document will be revised to > correspond directly to RDF datatyping.) Peter - I would oppose moving to LC with the line above in our document -- for a lot of reasons: i. it implies we will release a new document during the LC period (bad practive and possibly outlawed by process) ii. it states as a WG consensus that there is a problem w/RDF datatyping, which was NOT in our consensus review to RDF Core and therefore could prompt them to issue a process objection to our LC iii. It does not say what happens if our "hopes" are not fulfilled I suggest the following somewhat more process-neutral wording: (The specifics of datatype theories used here differ slightly from those in the RDF semantics currently under review. It is expected that these discrepancies will be resolved during last call, following which this document will be revised to correspond directly to RDF datatyping.) -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-731-3822 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 14:51:15 UTC