Re: implementation issues with b-node sharing (5.26 DL syntax)

I don't recall saying anything about implementation experience in a
telecon, but I did state at the editors meeting that I doubt if
structure sharing would be problematic for implementations, that it
would probably involve extra work to check that no such sharing was
taking place, and that I doubt if many implementors would bother with
such a check.

Sean and Raphael will be in a better position than me to confirm if
this is really the case, e.g., in the species validator.

The problem with structure sharing would be finding the resource to
change S&AS (changes could be quite significant).


On March 25, Dan Connolly writes:
> Ian, Sean, Raphael, Jean-François, and everybody,
> In one of the recent telcons, 13 or 20 March,
> I'm not sure which, I think Ian mentioned some
> implementation experience, or at least design sketch,
> relevant to the bnode structure sharing (B1, B2) stuff.
> I thought I heard that species validation would be
> more difficult if structure sharing were part of
> the design.
> Would you please elaborate?
> I realize the issue is closed, but I think supplementing
> the telcon records with relevant information is in order.
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 13:45:44 UTC