- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:34:48 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On 25 Mar 2003, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Ian, Sean, Raphael, Jean-François, and everybody, > > In one of the recent telcons, 13 or 20 March, > I'm not sure which, I think Ian mentioned some > implementation experience, or at least design sketch, > relevant to the bnode structure sharing (B1, B2) stuff. > > I thought I heard that species validation would be > more difficult if structure sharing were part of > the design. > > Would you please elaborate? I don't recall this from a telecon, but two relevant messages from the list are: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0088.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0089.html If the assumptions in those mails are correct (and there were no follow-ups to suggest the contrary), then I think that allowing structure sharing makes validation *easier*, as you don't actually need to check whether it's happening or not. Sean -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 13:35:46 UTC