I took 2 actions in the telecon today w.r.t. datatypes. Here are the PROPOSED testcases. In order to indicate that an OWL reasoner has to have support for e.g. xsd:byte we add following <test:datatypeSupport rdf:resource ="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#byte" /> property to the manifest (like done for the RDF testcases but not needed for the datatypes xsd:integer and xsd:string). To reflect that we have modified following testcases http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest001 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest002 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest003 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest004 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest005 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest006 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest007 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest008 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest009 http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest010 We also PROPOSE that the empty graph entails that xsd:integer and xsd:string are a rdfs:Datatype http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest011 -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ PS Jeremy, I would like to call you, but I lost your phone number somewhere, so if you could mail it and then I propose to call you tomorrowReceived on Thursday, 20 March 2003 18:03:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:43 UTC